# Atomic Glue Glossary > 472 plain-English definitions for web development, SEO, and digital marketing terms. --- ### 301 Redirect (seo) A 301 redirect is a permanent redirect that passes nearly all link equity from the old URL to the new URL, signaling to search engines that content has moved permanently. ## Definition A 301 redirect tells browsers and search engines: 'This page has moved forever. Use the new URL.' It is the standard way to handle deleted pages, site migrations, URL restructuring, and domain changes. For SEO, a 301 passes approximately 90-99% of [link equity](/glossary/link-equity) to the new URL, making it the safest way to preserve rankings during site changes. ## When to Use 301 vs Other Redirects Use **301** for permanent moves: site migration, domain change, merging two pages. Use **302** for temporary moves: A/B testing, seasonal landing pages, short-term campaigns. Use **307** as the modern HTTP 1.1 equivalent of 302. Use **meta refresh** redirects (HTML level) only as a last resort; they pass less equity and degrade user experience. ## Redirect Chain Avoidance A redirect chain occurs when URL A redirects to B, which redirects to C. Each hop dilutes link equity and slows page load. Google recommends keeping redirect chains to a maximum of 3 hops. Better: update all internal links to point directly to the final URL, eliminating unnecessary redirects. ## Note Do not use 301 redirects for temporary purposes. Using a permanent redirect for a temporary campaign means Google will cache the redirect permanently, potentially causing long-term indexing problems when you want the old URL back. --- ### 302 Redirect (seo) A 302 redirect is a temporary redirect that tells search engines the move is not permanent, preserving the original URL as the canonical destination. ## Definition A 302 redirect signals: 'This content is temporarily at this new URL. Do not update your index. Keep the original URL as the primary address.' Unlike [301 redirects](/glossary/301-redirect), 302s do not transfer link equity to the destination URL because Google expects the original URL to return. ## When 302s Are Appropriate Use 302s for A/B testing (where the variant URLs change), seasonal promotions (holiday landing pages), soft launches, temporary maintenance pages, and URL-based campaign tracking that should not change the canonical URL. ## The 302 Mistake The most common 302 error: using it for permanent redirects. Some site owners mistakenly use 302 for site migrations because they think they might revert. This prevents link equity transfer and confuses Google. If the move is permanent, use 301. You can always change your mind later, but start with the right status code. ## Note Google has gotten better at recognizing 302 abuse. In some cases, Google may treat a long-standing 302 as a de facto 301 if it has been in place for months. But do not rely on this. Use the correct status code from the start. --- ### 404 Error (seo) A 404 error is an HTTP status code indicating that a requested page does not exist on the server, typically due to a broken link, deleted page, or mistyped URL. ## Definition 404 errors are the web's 'dead ends.' They happen when a user or bot requests a URL that no longer exists or never existed. From an SEO perspective, the damage depends on context. A few 404s on a large site are normal and harmless. Thousands of 404s on a small site signal poor maintenance. 404 errors on pages that once had backlinks waste those links. ## Soft 404s: The Hidden Problem A soft 404 is worse than a real 404. It occurs when a page returns a 200 (success) status code but displays a 'Page Not Found' message or blank content. Google interprets this as a thin content page and may associate the 200 status with poor quality across the site. Always return a proper 404 or 410 status for deleted content. ## Managing 404s Use [301 redirects](/glossary/301-redirect) to send deleted pages to relevant replacements. Create custom 404 pages with navigation to help users. Monitor 404s in [Google Search Console](/glossary/google-search-console) and fix the highest-value ones. Use 410 (Gone) instead of 404 if the page was intentionally and permanently removed. ## Note Not all 404s need fixing. A 404 from a mistyped URL that no one links to is irrelevant. A 404 from a page that had backlinks or high traffic requires action. Prioritize based on value at risk. --- ### A/B Testing (cro) A/B testing is a controlled experiment that compares two versions of a web page or element to determine which performs better against a specific goal. It removes guesswork from optimization. If you are making changes without testing, you are gambling, not optimizing. ## Definition A/B testing (also called split testing or bucket testing) is a randomized experiment with two variants: A (the control, usually the current version) and B (the variant, the proposed change). Traffic is split evenly between the two variants. The variant that achieves a statistically significant improvement on the target metric wins. A/B testing is the gold standard of CRO because it isolates the effect of a single change and provides causal evidence that the change caused the difference. ## The Anatomy of a Valid A/B Test A valid A/B test requires: (1) A single, measurable hypothesis with a clear success metric. (2) Random assignment of users to variants. (3) A predetermined sample size calculated before the test starts. (4) A significance threshold (usually 95%) set before the test. (5) A fixed duration calculated to account for day-of-week and time-of-day effects. (6) The discipline to not peek at results and stop early. Violating any of these invalidates the test. ## Common A/B Testing Mistakes The most common mistakes: stopping the test early because results look promising (peeking fallacy), testing too many changes at once (multivariate confusion), running the test for too few days (not capturing weekly cycles), using insufficient sample size (low statistical power), testing changes that are too small to matter (button color obsessions), and ignoring segmentation (a change that helps mobile may hurt desktop). ## The 'Button Color' Trap A/B testing is often trivialized as 'button color testing'. Button color matters, but the impact is usually small (0-5%). The big wins come from testing structural changes: headline copy, value proposition, information architecture, offer structure, navigation removal, and form field reduction. Prioritize high-impact tests. Do not waste your traffic budget on 50 shades of blue. ## Note Google Optimize was deprecated in 2023. Do not build new testing infrastructure on it. Modern alternatives: server-side feature flags (LaunchDarkly, Statsig), client-side libraries (GrowthBook, VWO, Optimizely), or a custom statistical engine. The tool matters less than the methodology. ## In code ``` ``` ## Common questions Q: How much traffic do I need to A/B test? A: Enough to reach statistical significance within a reasonable timeframe. Use a sample size calculator. For a 20% relative improvement on a 5% conversion rate, you need roughly 5,000 visitors per variant. Lower traffic sites should use qualitative methods instead. Q: How long should I run an A/B test? A: Minimum one full business cycle (usually 7 days). Longer if you have weekly seasonality. Run until you reach the predetermined sample size, not until results look significant. Q: What if the test shows no winner? A: A null result is a result. It tells you the change did not matter. Learn from it. Document the hypothesis and move to the next test. Not every test produces a winner. Sources: [CXL: A/B Testing Guide](https://cxl.com/blog/ab-testing-guide/), [Optimizely: A/B Testing](https://www.optimizely.com/optimization-glossary/ab-testing/), [VWO: A/B Testing 101](https://vwo.com/ab-testing/) --- ### Above the Fold (cro) Above the fold refers to the portion of a webpage visible without scrolling. It originated in print journalism. On the modern web, its meaning has shifted dramatically due to mobile devices, infinite scroll, and varied screen sizes. What matters is not a fixed pixel line but the first impression users form in the first few seconds. ## Definition Above the fold is the content area users see immediately after a page loads, before any scrolling. The term comes from newspapers, where the most important story was placed on the upper half of the front page, above the physical fold. On the web, the fold is not a fixed line. It depends on screen size, browser chrome, device orientation, and operating system. The core principle survives: the first screen of content must capture attention, communicate value, and guide the user toward the next step. ## The Mobile-First Reality The fold varies wildly across devices. A 27-inch desktop monitor shows vastly more 'above the fold' than an iPhone SE. Modern responsive design makes the fold a spectrum, not a line. The 600px rule of thumb is dead. Design for the critical content that must be visible on the smallest expected viewport, then progressively enhance for larger screens. ## What the Fold Myth Gets Wrong The old belief that 'nothing important should go below the fold' has been debunked by eye-tracking studies and scroll maps. Users do scroll. They scroll more when they trust that more content is worth seeing. The fold is not a wall. It is a threshold. The real sin is putting everything above the fold, creating a cluttered, overwhelming first view that makes users leave before they scroll. ## Modern Above-the-Fold Strategy Three things must live above the fold: (1) A clear value proposition that answers 'What is this and why should I care?' (2) A visible primary CTA. (3) Trust signals that reassure the user they are in the right place. Everything else can scroll. The hero section evolved precisely to handle this balance. ## Note The 'fold' is not a universal line. Stop optimizing for a 1024x768 desktop fold in a mobile-first world. Use CSS dvh units and responsive design. Test on real devices. The fold is wherever your user's screen ends. ## In code ```

Audit Your Site. Find Leaks. Increase Revenue.

Get a free CRO audit in 48 hours.

Claim Your Free Audit
``` ## Common questions Q: Is the fold still relevant in 2026? A: The concept is relevant. The fixed pixel measurement is not. The first impression still matters enormously. But the fold is dynamic, device-dependent, and less important than the overall page narrative. Q: Do users scroll below the fold? A: Yes. Multiple studies show 70-80% of users scroll. The key is giving them a reason to scroll: progressive disclosure, clear visual hierarchy, and compelling content that builds on the above-the-fold promise. Q: Should I put everything above the fold? A: No. That is the fastest way to create a cluttered, confusing page. Prioritize three things: value proposition, CTA, and trust signals. Let the rest flow below. Sources: [NN Group: The Fold Manifesto](https://www.nngroup.com/articles/page-fold-manifesto/), [CXL: Above the Fold Redux](https://cxl.com/blog/above-the-fold/), [Google: Mobile First Indexing](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/mobile-first-indexing) --- ### Accessibility (a11y) (accessibility) Accessibility (often shortened to a11y for the 11 letters between the A and the Y) means designing and building digital products that people of all abilities can perceive, understand, navigate, interact with, and contribute to. It is not a feature tier or a special mode. It is a fundamental property of well-built software, no different from security or performance. ## Definition Accessibility in web and software development is the practice of removing barriers that prevent interaction with or access to digital products by people with a wide range of physical, cognitive, and sensory abilities. This includes people who are blind or have low vision, who are deaf or hard of hearing, who have motor disabilities affecting keyboard or touch use, who have cognitive disabilities affecting memory or reading, and those who rely on assistive technologies such as screen readers, voice recognition software, switch devices, or alternative input methods. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) provide the internationally recognised technical standard for web accessibility, organised around four principles: content must be Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust (POUR). Accessibility is increasingly a legal requirement under laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Section 508, and the European Accessibility Act (EAA), and it correlates strongly with better SEO, improved usability for all users, and reduced legal risk. ## Why accessibility matters: beyond compliance Accessibility is often framed as a compliance checkbox, but treating it as a checklist misses the point. Around 15 percent of the global population experience some form of disability. That is over one billion people. When a website is inaccessible, it is not merely an inconvenience. It is an active barrier to employment, education, commerce, healthcare, and civic participation. Beyond ethics and legality, accessible websites consistently rank higher in search results (clean semantic HTML, proper heading structure, and descriptive alt text are all SEO signals), reach a wider audience, and are more resilient to device and browser diversity. The overlap between accessibility improvements and good UX is so large that accessibility is best understood as a form of quality assurance. ## The four principles: POUR WCAG organises accessibility requirements around four principles. Perceivable: users must be able to perceive the content through at least one sense. This means text alternatives for images, captions for audio, and sufficient colour contrast. Operable: users must be able to operate the interface. This means keyboard navigation, enough time to read and use content, and no seizure-inducing flashes. Understandable: users must be able to understand the content and interface. This means readable text, predictable behaviour, and helpful error messages. Robust: content must be robust enough to be interpreted by a wide variety of user agents, including assistive technologies. This means clean, valid markup that exposes semantics properly. ## The business case for accessibility Studies from Google, McKinsey, and the W3C WAI consistently show that accessible organisations outperform their peers. Accessibility reduces maintenance overhead (semantic, well-structured code is easier to maintain), improves SEO rankings (Google uses heading hierarchy and alt text as ranking signals), decreases legal exposure (ADA demand letters and lawsuits are rising yearly), and opens market share among the disability community and an ageing global population. One in four US adults live with a disability, controlling over $490 billion in disposable income. Accessibility is not a cost centre. It is a business multiplier. ## Common questions Q: Is accessibility the same as disability support? A: Accessibility benefits everyone, not just people with permanent disabilities. A person with a broken arm, a new parent holding a baby, someone in bright sunlight, or someone with a slow internet connection all benefit from accessible design. This is the curb-cut effect: features designed for one group often improve the experience for everyone. Q: Can an accessibility overlay make my site accessible? A: No. Accessibility overlays that claim to fix a site with a single line of JavaScript are widely condemned by the disability community and accessibility professionals. They cannot fix underlying structural problems and often introduce new barriers. The W3C's Overlay Fact Sheet, signed by over 1,000 accessibility experts, explains why. Q: Is accessibility an SEO ranking factor? A: Directly and indirectly, yes. Google uses semantic HTML, heading hierarchy, alt text, and mobile-friendliness as ranking signals, all of which are core accessibility requirements. Beyond that, accessible sites tend to load faster, be easier to crawl, and have lower bounce rates, all of which influence search rankings. Sources: [W3C WAI - Accessibility Fundamentals](https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/), [MDN Accessibility](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility), [Overlay Fact Sheet](https://overlayfactsheet.com/en), [WebAIM - The WebAIM Million](https://webaim.org/projects/million/) --- ### Accessibility Audit (accessibility) An accessibility audit is a systematic evaluation of a website, application, or digital product against accessibility standards (typically WCAG 2.2 AA). It combines automated scanning (axe-core, WAVE), manual testing (keyboard, screen reader), expert review, and sometimes user testing to produce a comprehensive list of issues and remediation guidance. ## Definition An accessibility audit is a structured process for identifying barriers in a digital product and measuring its conformance against a chosen accessibility standard, most commonly WCAG 2.2 Level AA. A thorough audit is not a single activity but a combination of methods: automated scanning picks up technical failures like missing alt text, insufficient colour contrast, and unlabelled form fields. Manual keyboard testing verifies that all functionality is reachable by keyboard alone. Screen reader testing validates that content is announced correctly. Expert review identifies issues that automated tools cannot catch, such as inappropriate ARIA usage, poor heading hierarchy, or confusing focus order. Some audits also include user testing with people who have disabilities, which provides the highest fidelity feedback. The deliverable is typically a report with each issue mapped to a WCAG success criterion, severity rating, and fix recommendation. Regular audits (quarterly or per release) are necessary because accessibility must be maintained, not achieved once. ## What an accessibility audit tests Automated checks: colour contrast, alt text presence, form label association, heading hierarchy, landmark presence, ARIA syntax, duplicate IDs, and link text clarity. Manual checks: keyboard navigation (Tab through every interactive element, verify focus order and visibility), screen reader testing with NVDA or VoiceOver (navigate by headings, landmarks, forms, and links), zoom testing (200% page zoom), text spacing testing (ensure no content is cut off), focus management (modals, SPA navigation, dynamic content). Expert review: semantic correctness, ARIA appropriateness, form error handling, cognitive load assessment, and conformance to the spirit of WCAG, not just the letter. ## The accessibility audit lifecycle Audits should happen at multiple points. Discovery audit: baseline assessment of an existing product to understand the scope of remediation. Design audit: review wireframes and prototypes before development begins, catching issues when they are cheapest to fix. Development audit: continuous, integrated into CI/CD using axe-core and automated checks, catching regressions per commit. Pre-launch audit: full manual and automated pass before going live. Maintenance audit: periodic (quarterly or semi-annual) to catch regressions from ongoing development. An audit is not a one-time event. Accessibility rots as code changes, dependencies update, and content gets added. ## Common questions Q: How long does an accessibility audit take? A: It depends on the complexity of the site. A reasonably thorough audit of a 10-page marketing site with manual and automated testing takes 3-5 business days. A SaaS application with dozens of states (logged in, logged out, empty, error, success) can take weeks. The more you automate in CI/CD, the less manual regression testing is needed each cycle. Q: Can an automated tool give me a complete audit? A: No. Automated tools catch about 20-40 percent of accessibility issues. The rest require human judgment, manual testing, and expert review. No automated tool can determine whether a focus order is logical, whether alt text is appropriate, whether ARIA is semantically correct, or whether a user experience is comprehensible. Sources: [W3C WAI - Evaluation Tools](https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/tools/), [W3C - Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM)](https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/conformance/), [WebAIM - Accessibility Evaluation](https://webaim.org/articles/evaluation/) --- ### Accessibility Overlay (accessibility) An accessibility overlay is a third-party script (typically JavaScript) that a website operator adds to their site, claiming it will automatically detect and fix accessibility problems and/or add a toolbar of accessibility settings. Overlays are widely condemned by the disability community and accessibility professionals. They cannot make a site accessible, often introduce new barriers, and in some cases increase legal liability. The W3C Overlay Fact Sheet, signed by over 1,000 experts, explains why. ## Definition Accessibility overlays (also called widgets, toolbars, or accessibility plugins) are third-party JavaScript products that promise to improve a website's accessibility by applying automated fixes to the page code and/or by adding a front-end toolbar that lets users change font sizes, contrast, colour schemes, and other display preferences. Overlays come in two varieties. Widget overlays add a toolbar of display controls (font size, contrast, line spacing) that duplicate functionality already present in every major browser and operating system. Auto-repair overlays scan the page's DOM and attempt to inject missing alt text, add ARIA attributes, fix heading structure, and repair other accessibility issues automatically. Both types are deeply problematic. The accessibility community, the W3C, the DOJ, and numerous disability advocacy organisations have issued statements against overlays. The core problem: real accessibility requires structural code changes, semantic HTML, thoughtful content authoring, and testing with real users. No script running in the browser can fix what is wrong at the server-rendered or application-architecture level. Automated repair frequently introduces new barriers: auto-generated alt text is often wrong or nonsensical, injected ARIA can conflict with existing semantics, and toolbar widgets can create focus traps, interfere with keyboard navigation, and expose user disability data to third-party cookies. ## Why overlays do not work Overlays operate on the client side after the page has already been rendered. They cannot fix problems in the underlying source code, the server-side templates, or the content management system. If your images lack alt text, the overlay can generate alt text algorithmically, but generated alt text is often inaccurate, misleading, or comically wrong. If your form has unlabelled fields, the overlay can attempt to infer labels from context, but it cannot know the developer's intent. If your heading hierarchy is broken, the overlay can attempt to rewrite the DOM, but it cannot restructure your content. If your application uses a JavaScript framework (React, Vue, Angular), the overlay may not be able to keep up with dynamic state changes. And because overlays run on every page load, they add JavaScript overhead that slows down page performance, disproportionately affecting users on low-end devices. The Overlay Fact Sheet documents all of these failure modes. The most damning evidence comes from screen reader users themselves, who report that overlay-laden sites are often less usable than before the overlay was installed. ## Legal risk and regulatory positions Overlays do not confer legal protection. In 2024, over 1,000 companies with active overlay widgets received ADA lawsuits. The US Department of Justice has explicitly addressed overlays in its ruling on web accessibility, stating that automated tools alone are insufficient for compliance. The DOJ's 2024 Title II rule requires state and local governments to follow WCAG 2.1 and explicitly rejects the idea that an overlay can substitute for conformance. The W3C Overlay Fact Sheet notes that overlay vendors' claims of full compliance are false and should be viewed with significant skepticism. Several overlay companies, including AccessiBe, have been sued by disability rights advocates. The pattern is clear: overlays increase, not decrease, legal exposure. ## Privacy concerns Overlays that offer screen-reader-specific or disability-specific settings must first detect whether a user is using assistive technology. This detection typically identifies the user as having a disability and can expose that information to third-party tracking, analytics, and advertising networks. The Overlay Fact Sheet specifically warns that this creates risk under GDPR, the UK GDPR, and CCPA. Users with disabilities did not consent to being identified and tracked because they visited your website. Additionally, overlays that persist settings across sites (via cookies) track users across the web without their knowledge, creating further privacy violations. ## Note The overlay industry is a cautionary tale about technology solutionism applied to a human and structural problem. Overlays exist because genuine accessibility work is perceived as expensive and difficult. But overlays create a false sense of compliance while delivering a worse experience for the very users they claim to help. The only viable path to digital accessibility is the unglamorous one: build with semantic HTML, test with real assistive technology, and invest in continuous maintenance. ## Common questions Q: Are all overlays the same? A: Not exactly, but the differences are largely irrelevant in practice. Some overlays are just toolbars that add font size and contrast controls. Others claim to perform automated repair of WCAG issues. None can deliver genuine accessibility or legal compliance. The W3C Overlay Fact Sheet covers both varieties and explains why each has fundamental limitations. Q: My overlay vendor offers a compliance guarantee. Is that real? A: No. No overlay vendor can guarantee WCAG compliance because compliance requires meeting all WCAG success criteria, and no overlay can fix, for example, the need for accurate captions, correct reading order, logical focus management, or appropriate audio descriptions. These require human judgment and content creation. Compliance guarantees from overlay vendors are not backed by any regulatory body and have been challenged in court. Q: I already bought an overlay. What should I do? A: Keep the toolbar features (font size, contrast) if they provide a familiar UI for some users. Disable any auto-repair features immediately. They are causing more harm than good. And start the real work: a proper accessibility audit followed by structural remediation of code and content. Treat the overlay as a temporary bandage, not a solution. Atomic Glue can help with the transition. Sources: [Overlay Fact Sheet (W3C)](https://overlayfactsheet.com/en), [W3C Community - Overlay Fact Sheet Discussion](https://www.w3.org/community/a11yedge/tag/overlay-fact-sheet), [Overlay Lawsuit Tracker](https://convergeaccessibility.com/accessibility-overlay-lawsuit-tracker/), [The A11Y Project - Accessibility Overlays](https://www.a11yproject.com/posts/accessibility-overlays/) --- ### Accessible Forms (accessibility) Accessible forms are form controls that every user can perceive, understand, and complete. This means every input has a visible and programmatically associated label, clear error messages, logical focus order, and sufficient touch or click target sizes. Poorly built forms are one of the most common barriers on the web and a frequent source of WCAG violations. ## Definition Accessible forms follow a set of HTML and UX practices that ensure all users can complete forms successfully. At minimum: every form control must have a programmatically associated